Historical method: these April 2026 results used an earlier 36-check, five-dimension method and have not been recomputed under the current 44-rule technical diagnostic. They are not comparable with a current score and do not establish rankings, live AI mentions, citations, recommendations or causality.

Visibility Score
Historical Technical Readiness Benchmark · April 2026
United Kingdom · UK Law Firms (Top 50)

Historical Technical Readiness Benchmark
UK Law Firms

April 2026 · 13 stored results from a legacy methodology

60.9
Median Score
65.1
Highest Score
49.5
Lowest Score
13
Firms Ranked
64.2
75th Percentile

Score Distribution

0
0
0
10
0
20
0
30
1
40
4
50
8
60
0
70
0
80
0
90
0Score out of 100100

Full Rankings

Sorted by overall Technical AI Readiness Score. SEO / AEO / GEO sub-scores shown.

# Firm Domain Score Grade SEO / AEO / GEO Percentile
1 Baker McKenzie bakermckenzie.com 65 C 81 / 49 / 57 Top 20%
2 Slaughter and May slaughterandmay.com 65 C 77 / 49 / 55 Top 20%
3 Pinsent Masons pinsentmasons.com 65 C 82 / 52 / 52 Above median
4 Ashurst ashurst.com 64 C 75 / 53 / 60 Above median
5 Norton Rose Fulbright nortonrosefulbright.com 63 C 71 / 46 / 58 Above median
6 Allen & Overy allenovery.com 61 C 76 / 49 / 55 Above median
7 Taylor Wessing taylorwessing.com 61 C 57 / 51 / 59 Below median
8 DLA Piper dlapiper.com 60 C 70 / 48 / 52 Below median
9 Clifford Chance cliffordchance.com 60 D 68 / 49 / 59 Below median
10 Freshfields freshfields.com 58 D 67 / 49 / 57 Below median
11 Hogan Lovells hoganlovells.com 56 D 61 / 61 / 56 Bottom 20%
12 Linklaters linklaters.com 55 D 68 / 49 / 50 Bottom 20%
13 Simmons & Simmons simmons-simmons.com 50 D 53 / 44 / 56 Bottom 20%

Methodology

This page preserves results generated with an earlier 36-check method across five dimensions: SEO (technical foundations, structured data, crawlability), AEO (answer engine optimisation, FAQ structure, featured snippet targeting), GEO (generative engine optimisation, citation signals, entity clarity), Compliance (GDPR consent, accessibility), and Performance (Core Web Vitals).

The figures describe historical observable website signals. They do not measure search rankings, live AI mentions, citations, recommendations or current engine surfacing, and they are not comparable with the current 44-rule score.

Disclaimer: These historical results were generated from public website signals using the earlier method. They do not constitute professional advice, legal opinion, or a comprehensive audit. Rankings are for benchmarking purposes only. Firms wishing to dispute a score or request removal from future benchmarks should contact [email protected].

See your firm's full report

The current technical diagnostic is separate from this historical benchmark and describes issues to review.

Get your free technical readiness check